lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F39F82FED@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 11 Dec 2015 22:45:33 +0000
From:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
CC:	"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCHV2 3/3] x86, ras: Add mcsafe_memcpy() function to recover
 from machine checks

>> But a machine check safe copy_from_user() would be useful
>> current generation cpus that broadcast all the time.
>
> Fair enough.

Thanks for spending the time to look at this.  Coaxing me to re-write the
tail of do_machine_check() has made that code much better. Too many
years of one patch on top of another without looking at the whole context.

Cogitate on this series over the weekend and see if you can give me
an Acked-by or Reviewed-by (I'll be adding a #define for BIT(63)).

-Tony

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ