[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151211083705.GF4884@kuha.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 10:37:05 +0200
From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Noam Camus <noamc@...hip.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"jslaby@...e.com" <jslaby@...e.com>,
"peter@...leysoftware.com" <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
"fransklaver@...il.com" <fransklaver@...il.com>,
"Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com" <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>,
"vgupta@...opsys.com" <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-v8] serial: 8250_dw: Add support for big-endian MMIO
accesses
Hi Noam,
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 04:33:39PM +0000, Noam Camus wrote:
> Please see
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/8/3/806
> Why I added private accessors.
Greg is not saying anything about the iotype checking there? Looks
more like confusion about what exactly is that patch trying to
achieve. I think Greg just thought you moved the writel call from
the beginning of the function to be called later inside the "else"
condition.
You need to start your series with a patch where you just separate the
lcr checking to its own function and follow that with patches where
you introduce the big-endian support. I think this is also what Andy
told you. Use the diff I gave you.
One more thing that I forgot to comment before:
s/dw8250_check_LCR/dw8250_check_lcr/
Thanks,
--
heikki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists