[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874mfpc90f.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 17:14:40 +0200
From: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
vince@...ter.net, eranian@...gle.com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v0 3/5] perf: Introduce instruction trace filtering
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 03:36:36PM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>> @@ -5921,6 +6010,8 @@ static void perf_event_comm_event(struct perf_comm_event *comm_event)
>>
>> comm_event->event_id.header.size = sizeof(comm_event->event_id) + size;
>>
>> + if (comm_event->event_id.header.misc == PERF_RECORD_MISC_COMM_EXEC)
>> + perf_event_aux(perf_itrace_exec, comm_event, NULL, true);
>
> Maybe put this in perf_event_exec() ?
Good point, I'm not actually even using the 'comm_event' in
perf_itrace_exec() for anything.
Thanks,
--
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists