[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151211215312.GA13181@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 14:53:12 -0700
From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
To: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ldv-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfit: acpi_nfit_notify(): Do not leave device locked
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 11:24:10PM +0300, Alexey Khoroshilov wrote:
> Even if dev->driver is null because we are being removed,
> it is safer to not leave device locked.
>
> Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/nfit.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
> index e7ed39bab97d..aa45d4802707 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
> @@ -1810,7 +1810,7 @@ static void acpi_nfit_notify(struct acpi_device *adev, u32 event)
> if (!dev->driver) {
> /* dev->driver may be null if we're being removed */
> dev_dbg(dev, "%s: no driver found for dev\n", __func__);
> - return;
> + goto out_unlock;
> }
>
> if (!acpi_desc) {
This seems correct to me. Thanks for the patch.
Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists