[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151214093121.GU5284@mwanda>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 12:31:22 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] staging: lustre: Rename a jump label for
ptlrpc_req_finished() calls
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:08:03AM +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Markus, please stop sending these things to rename out labels unless
> > there is a bug. CodingStyle allows out labels.
>
> How does this feedback fit to information like the following?
>
> "…
> Chapter 7: …
> …
> Choose label names which say what the goto does or why the goto exists.
A lot of people think "out" says what the goto does and why it exists.
I personally don't agree with them but if you look at when I complain
about it, it's almost always when it causes a bug.
> … Avoid using GW-BASIC names …
Those when people just use numbers for their label names instead of
words like out1, out2, out4, out5. It's a different thing.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists