linux-kernel - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86/pvh: Use HVM's flush_tlb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Dec 2015 13:58:49 +0000
From:	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To:	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
	<david.vrabel@...rix.com>, <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC:	<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<jbeulich@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86/pvh: Use HVM's flush_tlb_others op

On 13/12/15 00:25, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> Using MMUEXT_TLB_FLUSH_MULTI doesn't buy us much since the hypervisor
> will likely perform same IPIs as would have the guest.
> 
> More importantly, using MMUEXT_INVLPG_MULTI may not to invalidate the
> guest's address on remote CPU (when, for example, VCPU from another guest
> is running there).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
> Suggested-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 3.14+

Applied to for-linus-4.4, thanks.  But given that PVH is experimental
I've dropped the stable Cc.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/