[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <566ECCAE.7080702@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 09:05:34 -0500
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>, konrad.wilk@...cle.com
Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jbeulich@...e.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86/pvh: Use HVM's flush_tlb_others op
On 12/14/2015 08:58 AM, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 13/12/15 00:25, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> Using MMUEXT_TLB_FLUSH_MULTI doesn't buy us much since the hypervisor
>> will likely perform same IPIs as would have the guest.
>>
>> More importantly, using MMUEXT_INVLPG_MULTI may not to invalidate the
>> guest's address on remote CPU (when, for example, VCPU from another guest
>> is running there).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
>> Suggested-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 3.14+
> Applied to for-linus-4.4, thanks. But given that PVH is experimental
> I've dropped the stable Cc.
The reason I want this to go to stable is that I will be removing access
to MMUEXT_TLB_FLUSH_MULTI and MMUEXT_INVLPG_MULTI to PVH guests in the
hypervisor (as part of merging HVM and PVH hypercall tables) and that
will result in essentially unbootable PVH guests due to warnings flood.
-boris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists