[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151215090329.GE16565@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 10:03:29 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] perf tools: Try to show pretty printed output for
dynamic sort keys
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:46:13AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Each tracepoint event has format string for print to improve
> readability. Try to parse the output and match the field name. If it
> finds one, use that for the result. If not, fallbacks to the original
> output.
>
> For example, sort on kmem:kmalloc.gfp_flags looks like below:
> (Note: libtraceevent plugins are not installed on my system. They might
> affect the output below)
>
> Before:
> # Overhead Command gfp_flags
> # ........ ....... ..........
> #
> 99.89% perf 32848
> 0.06% sleep 208
> 0.03% perf 32976
> 0.01% perf 208
>
> After:
> # Overhead Command gfp_flags
> # ........ ....... ...................
> #
> 99.89% perf GFP_NOFS|GFP_ZERO
> 0.06% sleep GFP_KERNEL
> 0.03% perf GFP_KERNEL|GFP_ZERO
> 0.01% perf GFP_KERNEL
hum, maybe we want some way to switch back to numbers?
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists