linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] perf tools: Try to show pretty printed output for dynamic sort keys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 15 Dec 2015 07:36:37 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] perf tools: Try to show pretty printed output for
 dynamic sort keys

Em Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:03:29AM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:46:13AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > Each tracepoint event has format string for print to improve
> > readability.  Try to parse the output and match the field name.  If it
> > finds one, use that for the result.  If not, fallbacks to the original
> > output.
> > 
> > For example, sort on kmem:kmalloc.gfp_flags looks like below:
> > (Note: libtraceevent plugins are not installed on my system.  They might
> > affect the output below)
> > 
> > Before:
> >   # Overhead  Command   gfp_flags
> >   # ........  .......  ..........
> >   #
> >       99.89%  perf          32848
> >        0.06%  sleep           208
> >        0.03%  perf          32976
> >        0.01%  perf            208
> > 
> > After:
> >   # Overhead  Command            gfp_flags
> >   # ........  .......  ...................
> >   #
> >       99.89%  perf       GFP_NOFS|GFP_ZERO
> >        0.06%  sleep             GFP_KERNEL
> >        0.03%  perf     GFP_KERNEL|GFP_ZERO
> >        0.01%  perf              GFP_KERNEL
> 
> hum, maybe we want some way to switch back to numbers?

Or remove repetitive stuff like GFP_? I guess this was done already for
perf kmem?

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/