[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151215151624.GB2772@windriver.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 10:16:24 -0500
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Pratyush Anand <pratyush.anand@...il.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>,
Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Richard Zhu <Richard.Zhu@...escale.com>,
Rocketboard Maillist <rfi@...ts.rocketboards.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] drivers/pci: avoid module_init in non-modular
host/pci*
[Re: [PATCH 00/10] drivers/pci: avoid module_init in non-modular host/pci*] On 14/12/2015 (Mon 11:27) Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 14 December 2015 10:19:40 Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > PCIe host driver that use fixup (DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_*) can't use tristate.
> > > Fixup region is in kernel region and this region if not updated when
> > > loading a module.
> >
> > Interesting, I hadn't thought about that. I suppose this means that the
> > module will end up containing an unused section with the fixup code. It
> > might be useful to add a way for that to trigger a warning at build
> > time.
> >
> > Perhaps to fix this a mechanism could be introduced to add a table of
> > fixups to a host controller driver and that will get applied to all
> > children of the bridge. It could be problematic to cover all of the
> > different fixup stages, though.
> >
>
>
> I think a lot of the fixups shouldn't really be there in the first place,
> they are about stuff that we can fix up in the probe function, or that should
> be fixed up in the probe function with some appropriate core support added.
So, the feedback on this is a bit all over the map, leaving me unsure
what to do next. And is the choice we make on a per board/bsp basis or
ideally across all platforms? I see the choices as:
1) do nothing; which IMHO is least desirable as it leaves the code
misrepresenting itself as modular; one of the key issues I wanted to fix
2) use the patches I've sent ; then as they are genuinely made modular,
the person doing so essentially "patch -R" or reverts the change as
step one. This has the advantage of solving the "we'll get to it
someday" issue if someday never comes.
3) make them all tristate; beat it with a stick until it compiles [M]
and modposts -- leaving the fixups and functional testing to people with
the boards and low level knowledge to make it _work_ as a module. The
downside here is the code is still kind of misrepresenting itself as
modularly functional -- a ban of unloading might mitigate that some.
Paul.
--
>
> Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists