[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq1r3iowk5j.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 20:55:04 -0500
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
emilne@...hat.com, Lee Duncan <lduncan@...e.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 1/1] SCSI: hosts: update to use ida_simple for host_no management
>>>>> "Hannes" == Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de> writes:
>> I'm not opposed to having the module option if others (Martin?) feel
>> they need it, but generally I think it's better to keep things as
>> simple as possible. So, unless there are strong objections, I would
>> say no.
Hannes> Agreeing with Ewan here.
Hannes> I guess it's up to you to tell us whether you absolutely need a
Hannes> module parameter ...
Still not a big ida fan but since the most people seem to be in favor of
this I guess I'll have to bite the bullet.
I don't see much value in the module parameter since it will require
customers to tweak their configs and reproduce. Not worth the hassle.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists