[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56730BEB.2050007@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 11:24:27 -0800
From: Lee Duncan <lduncan@...e.com>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Cc: emilne@...hat.com,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 1/1] SCSI: hosts: update to use ida_simple for host_no
management
On 12/14/2015 05:55 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>>>>>> "Hannes" == Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de> writes:
>
>>> I'm not opposed to having the module option if others (Martin?) feel
>>> they need it, but generally I think it's better to keep things as
>>> simple as possible. So, unless there are strong objections, I would
>>> say no.
>
> Hannes> Agreeing with Ewan here.
>
> Hannes> I guess it's up to you to tell us whether you absolutely need a
> Hannes> module parameter ...
>
> Still not a big ida fan but since the most people seem to be in favor of
> this I guess I'll have to bite the bullet.
>
> I don't see much value in the module parameter since it will require
> customers to tweak their configs and reproduce. Not worth the hassle.
>
Thank you Martin. I'll look at further cleaning up the host module, but
I think this still much better than leaving the code as is.
--
Lee Duncan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists