| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 15:23:08 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr> Subject: Re: blackfin-cpufreq: How to mark cpu_set_cclk() as static? On 21-12-15, 10:50, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > In which order would you prefer that the properties of the > function "cpu_set_cclk" will be improved? > * Should the linkage specifier be added on a separate source code line? No, it can be there in the same line. > * Can this fix be combined with my previous update suggestion for > the return type? I think the first patch is already Acked now and can be applied as it is. Just send the next patch based on the previous one. -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists