[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20151222.124606.1694650787450943904.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 12:46:06 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: cmetcalf@...hip.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk,
jmorris@...ei.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/clz_tab.c: put in lib-y rather than obj-y
From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 12:41:24 -0500
> The clz table (__clz_tab) in lib/clz_tab.c is also provided as part
> of libgcc.a, and many architectures link against libgcc. To allow
> the linker to avoid a multiple-definition link failure, clz_tab.o
> has to be in lib/lib.a rather than lib/builtin.o. The specific
> issue is that libgcc.a comes before lib/builtin.o on vmlinux.o's
> link command line, so its _clz.o is pulled to satisfy __clz_tab,
> and then when the remainder of lib/builtin.o is pulled in to satisfy
> all the other dependencies, the __clz_tab symbols conflict. By
> putting clz_tab.o in lib.a, the linker can simply avoid pulling
> it into vmlinux.o when this situation arises.
>
> The definitions of __clz_tab are the same in libgcc.a and in the
> kernel; arguably we could also simply rename the kernel version,
> but it's unlikely the libgcc version will ever change to become
> incompatible, so just using it seems reasonably safe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>
No objections from me:
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists