linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] extcon: add Maxim MAX3355 driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <567A0456.7090400@samsung.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Dec 2015 11:17:58 +0900
From:	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
To:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Cc:	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	"myungjoo.ham@...sung.com" <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
	devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] extcon: add Maxim MAX3355 driver

On 2015년 12월 22일 20:15, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On 12/22/2015 4:13 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> 
>>>>>> This patch depend on GPIOLIB configuration as following:
>>>>>> I modified it with following diff and applied it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/Kconfig b/drivers/extcon/Kconfig
>>>>>> index ba4db7d..3d89e60 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/extcon/Kconfig
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/extcon/Kconfig
>>>>>> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ config EXTCON_MAX14577
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     config EXTCON_MAX3355
>>>>>>            tristate "Maxim MAX3355 USB OTG EXTCON Support"
>>>>>> +       depends on GPIOLIB || COMPILE_TEST
>>>>>
>>>>>      If it won't compile w/o gpiolib, what's the use of COMIPLE_TEST?
>>>>>      And no, it shouldn't depend on gpiolib. It has empty stubs for the case of CONFIG_GPIOLIB=n. Obviously something is wrong with the GPIO headers, I'll look into it.
>>>>
>>>> Yes. When GPIOLIB is disabled, the build issue don't happen.
>>>
>>>     What? It surely does happen!
>>
>> hmm....
>> Sure. you need to check the include/linux/gpio/consumer.h.
>>
>> Because of build error happen, you miss to include the "linux/gpio/consumer.h"
>> header file in extcon-max3355.c. Please test it for enough time.
> 
>    Yes, with this file #include'd, it build fine now.
> 
>>>> because include/linux/gpio/consumer.h implement the dummy function
>>>> for all gpio functions if CONFIG_GPIOLIB is disabled.
>>>
>>>     Linus W. advised to #include this header explicitly -- I'll try and post.
>>
>> Don't necessary. I already updated it including the "include/linux/gpio/consumer.h".
> 
>    I saw that, yes.
> 
>>>> For correct operation of max3355, you should add the dependency
>>>> to the extcon-max3355.c driver. This driver use the GPIO library
>>>> certainly.
>>>
>>>     I disagree. The driver will just cease to load in this case. I don't see why we need such dependency. Only compilation time dependencies should be
>>> specified, I think.
>>
>> This driver have to depend on GPIOLIB.
>> Why are you disagreeing the COMPILE_TEST dependency? It is just compile test
>> without anything.
> 
>    I agree now. I still disagree about the gpiolib dependency though.

If gpiolib is disabled, extcon-max3355.c might not operate it correctly.
Just this driver could be built without operation because gpiolib function
will not do the any behavior.

I think that it is not too much problem. I should send the pull request within this week.
If you want to need more discussion of extcon-max3355.c,
I will not include it on pull request for v4.5 because there is issue.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/