[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1450837093.3537.6.camel@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 18:18:13 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...n.com>,
Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@...il.com>,
linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 68/77] ncr5380: Fix whitespace issues using regexp
On Wed, 2015-12-23 at 13:03 +1100, Finn Thain wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2015, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2015-12-23 at 11:56 +1100, Finn Thain wrote:
> > > On Tue, 22 Dec 2015, Joe Perches wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 2015-12-22 at 12:18 +1100, Finn Thain wrote:
> > > > > This patch is just the result of two substitutions. The first
> > > > > removes any tabs and spaces at the end of the line. The second
> > > > > replaces runs of tabs and spaces at the beginning of comment lines
> > > > > with a single space.
> > > >
> > > > I think the second of these isn't done well.
> > >
> > > The aim of this patch is not to fix code style, but to make it
> > > possible to compare these two files so that the fork can be repaired.
> > > Regexp is very helpful in creating uniformity (and a minimal diff).
> > >
> > > If this was a coding style issue, we would be discussing the use of
> > > kernel-doc format for the affected comments, not whitespace.
> > >
> > > > Many of these comments post reformatting are much worse to read
> > > > because of lost alignment.
> > >
> > > You exaggerate a very trivial point.
> >
> >
> >
> > I prefer that all patches be improvements.
> >
>
> Agreed. But the example you cited is an improvement, in that it creates
> consistency.
I think "consistency" isn't a useful argument.
The kernel code doesn't care about any other
external code bases.
> Like you, I prefer to see formal parameters aligned when wrapped. But this
> isn't a formal parameter list, it is a comment, and no comment should
> duplicate code.
>
> Can you suggest a better regexp? Since this is patch 68 in the series,
> there is a good chance that it will need to be regenerated.
I suggest you do 2 patches here. One that removes
unnecessary trailing spaces and converts multiple
leading spaces to tabs where appropriate and a
second patch that fixes whatever odd indentation
that does exist after comment leading *. I think
there aren't many instances of those and I think
those should be done by hand rather than regex.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists