[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1451191269-27624-1-git-send-email-stillcompiling@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 20:41:09 -0800
From: Joshua Clayton <stillcompiling@...il.com>
To: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Joshua Clayton <stillcompiling@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] staging: lustre: fix lock imbalance
nrs_resource_put_safe() might hold a lock one one struct
while operating on the other.
There are 2 levels of structures.
Use nrs_policy_put(), which has locking baked in.
sparse gives the following warning:
drivers/staging/lustre//lustre/ptlrpc/nrs.c:498:39:
warning: context imbalance in 'nrs_resource_put_safe' -
different lock contexts for basic block
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/nrs.c | 13 ++-----------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/nrs.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/nrs.c
index 7044e1f..9028b12 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/nrs.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/nrs.c
@@ -496,18 +496,9 @@ static void nrs_resource_put_safe(struct ptlrpc_nrs_resource **resp)
}
for (i = 0; i < NRS_RES_MAX; i++) {
- if (pols[i] == NULL)
- continue;
-
- if (nrs == NULL) {
- nrs = pols[i]->pol_nrs;
- spin_lock(&nrs->nrs_lock);
- }
- nrs_policy_put_locked(pols[i]);
+ if (pols[i])
+ nrs_policy_put(pols[i]);
}
-
- if (nrs != NULL)
- spin_unlock(&nrs->nrs_lock);
}
/**
--
2.6.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists