[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87poxqqp86.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 21:42:49 +0100
From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@...il.com>
To: Rajat Jain <rajatxjain@...il.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-newbie@...r.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: debugfs_remove_recursive() while a file is in use by userspace
Hi Rajat,
Rajat Jain <rajatxjain@...il.com> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to understand the behavior taken when a module calls
> debugfs_remove_recursive() on a directory, while files under that
> directory may still be in use by the userspace (for instance an
> ongoing read / write operation).
>
> Does the function wait
>
> (1) until all the currently executing file operation methods
> (read/write/map etc) have returned?
> OR
> (2) until the user has given up all references (descriptors) to the
> files under the directory (i.e. until release() method has been
> called)?
The current state is that both question are to be answered with "no",
i.e. debugfs file removal is racy.
I've recently sent a patch addressing this issue:
https://lkml.kernel.org/g/87y4dfukzy.fsf@gmail.com
Basically, it turns the answer to your first question into "yes".
Subsequent reads/writes will return a -EIO.
That patch (series) is still under review though.
Further reference can be found in the *sub*-thread rooted at
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1452470/focus=1467314
Best,
Nicolai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists