[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <5683B938020000F900023B48@relay2.provo.novell.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 20:00:08 -0700
From: "Gang He" <ghe@...e.com>
To: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: <ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com>, "Mark Fasheh" <MFasheh@...e.com>,
<rgoldwyn@...e.de>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Add online file check feature
Hello Andrew and Mark,
>>>
> On Fri, 25 Dec 2015 15:16:15 +0800 Gang He <ghe@...e.com> wrote:
>
>> When there are errors in the ocfs2 filesystem,
>> they are usually accompanied by the inode number which caused the error.
>> This inode number would be the input to fixing the file.
>> One of these options could be considered:
>> A file in the sys filesytem which would accept inode numbers.
>> This could be used to communication back what has to be fixed or is fixed.
>> You could write:
>> $# echo "<inode>" > /sys/fs/ocfs2/devname/filecheck/check
>> or
>> $# echo "<inode>" > /sys/fs/ocfs2/devname/filecheck/fix
>>
>> Compare with second version, I re-design filecheck sysfs interfaces, there
>> are three sysfs files(check, fix and set) under filecheck directory(see
> above),
>> sysfs will accept only one argument <inode>. Second, I adjust some code in
>> ocfs2_filecheck_repair_inode_block() function according to upstream
> feedback,
>> we cannot just add VALID_FL flag back as a inode block fix, then we will not
>
>> fix this field corruption currently until having a complete solution.
>> Compare with first version, I use strncasecmp instead of double strncmp
>> functions. Second, update the source file contribution vendor.
>
> This feature should be documented, please. That means all pseudo-file
> locations, all inputs, all outputs, expected behaviour etc etc. Enough
> info so that our users can usefully and fully use this feature in the
> minimum time. Documentation/filesystems/ocfs2.txt is the place for that.
I ever sent out a document which describes this feature, I will modify that document sightly since sysfs interfaces have been adjusted,
then send out to the list as a separated patch. Is it OK for you?
Thanks
Gang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists