linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Add online file check feature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20151229191455.562f5f42.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 29 Dec 2015 19:14:55 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Gang He" <ghe@...e.com>
Cc:	<ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com>, "Mark Fasheh" <MFasheh@...e.com>,
	<rgoldwyn@...e.de>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Add online file check feature

On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 20:00:08 -0700 "Gang He" <ghe@...e.com> wrote:

> > This feature should be documented, please.  That means all pseudo-file
> > locations, all inputs, all outputs, expected behaviour etc etc.  Enough
> > info so that our users can usefully and fully use this feature in the
> > minimum time.  Documentation/filesystems/ocfs2.txt is the place for that.
> I ever sent out a document which describes this feature, I will modify that document sightly since sysfs interfaces have been adjusted,
> then send out to the list as a separated patch. Is it OK for you?

Sounds good, thanks.  The documentation is important because it permits
reviewers to understand the proposed interfaces, which need to be
nailed down before there's any point in looking at the implementation.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/