[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+8MBb+MaZUK1vMPNwUchZJed0Fi3vh9_vFP2OoPZsUMoDO=ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:30:42 -0800
From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"elliott@....com" <elliott@....com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHV5 3/3] x86, ras: Add __mcsafe_copy() function to recover
from machine checks
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com> wrote:
> Fifth is just a hack because I clearly didn't understand what I was
> doing in parts 2&3 because my new class shows up as '3' not '1'!
>
> Andy: Can you explain the assembler/linker arithmetic for the class?
Never mind ... figured it out.
The fixup entry in the extable is:
label - . + 0x2000000 - BIAS
The "label - ." part evaluates to a smallish negative value (because
the .fixup section is bundled in towards the end of .text, and the
ex_table section comes right after.
Then you add 0x20000000 to get a positive number, then *subtract*
the BIAS. I'd picked BIAS = 0x40000000 thinking that would show
up directly in class bits. But 0x1ffff000 - 0x40000000 is 0xdffff000
so bits 31 & 31 are both set, and this is class3
I switched to BIAS 0xC0000000 ... and now I get class 1 entries
(bit31=0, bit30=1).
New patch series coming soon.
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists