[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201601021513.32814@pali>
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 15:13:32 +0100
From: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>,
Pavel Machel <pavel@....cz>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Nokia N900: twl4030-power different data in DTS and board code
Hello,
now I'm looking at differences between legacy board code and DTS file
for Nokia N900 and I see some inconsistency for twl4030-power driver.
In board code are defined more twl4030 power scripts which override
defaults defined in twl4030-power code. See:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c#n790
Next in DTS file is defined just "compatible" keyword, but no custom
scripts, see:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n900.dts#n416
And the last in DTS file is defined line:
compatible = "ti,twl4030-power-n900"
which is not in twl4030-power driver itself, see:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/mfd/twl4030-power.c#n851
So all this stuff looks like some errors when board code was ported to
DTS. Tony, can you look at this at all?
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@...il.com
Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists