linux-kernel - Re: Nokia N900: twl4030-power different data in DTS and board code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 2 Jan 2016 09:14:31 -0800
From:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:	Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
Cc:	Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>,
	Pavel Machel <pavel@....cz>,
	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
	Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Nokia N900: twl4030-power different data in DTS and board code

* Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com> [160102 06:14]:
> Hello,
> 
> now I'm looking at differences between legacy board code and DTS file
> for Nokia N900 and I see some inconsistency for twl4030-power driver.
> 
> In board code are defined more twl4030 power scripts which override
> defaults defined in twl4030-power code. See:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c#n790
> 
> Next in DTS file is defined just "compatible" keyword, but no custom
> scripts, see:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n900.dts#n416
> 
> And the last in DTS file is defined line:
> 
> compatible = "ti,twl4030-power-n900" 
> 
> which is not in twl4030-power driver itself, see:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/mfd/twl4030-power.c#n851
> 
> So all this stuff looks like some errors when board code was ported to
> DTS. Tony, can you look at this at all?

AFAIK it should work fine with the generic "ti,twl4030-power-idle-osc-off".
This means reboot works and regulators are cut off during off mode.

The n900 specific code was based on something before the TI generic values
were available I think. And the last time I looked at it I came to the
conclusion the n900 specific code is no better.

Or did I miss something? Are you seeing some issues with PM with dts based
code?

We can certainly add it to twl4030-power if it provides something that
the "ti,twl4030-power-idle-osc-off" does not.

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/