linux-kernel - Re: staging-slicoss: Replace variable initialisations by assignments in slic_if

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 3 Jan 2016 21:10:45 +0100
From:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lior Dotan <liodot@...il.com>,
	Christopher Harrer <charrer@...critech.com>
Subject: Re: staging-slicoss: Replace variable initialisations by assignments
 in slic_if_init()

>> Can such fine-tuning result in positive effects for the run-time behaviour?
> 
> If you can not benchmark and show the proof, don't even start to claim
> such a thing.

Which measurement results would you accept for further discussion?


>> My suggestions can result in measurable differences.
> 
> Show the proof please.

Which information presentations would finally qualify for "the proof"
you request now?

Which test systems will be representative for you?


> That's the only way I will ever accept anything else from you like this.

Are there any update suggestions remaining in the waiting queue
which have a higher chance of acceptance because their value might be
a bit more obvious?

Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/