| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <56898045.9010907@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 21:10:45 +0100 From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net> To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Lior Dotan <liodot@...il.com>, Christopher Harrer <charrer@...critech.com> Subject: Re: staging-slicoss: Replace variable initialisations by assignments in slic_if_init() >> Can such fine-tuning result in positive effects for the run-time behaviour? > > If you can not benchmark and show the proof, don't even start to claim > such a thing. Which measurement results would you accept for further discussion? >> My suggestions can result in measurable differences. > > Show the proof please. Which information presentations would finally qualify for "the proof" you request now? Which test systems will be representative for you? > That's the only way I will ever accept anything else from you like this. Are there any update suggestions remaining in the waiting queue which have a higher chance of acceptance because their value might be a bit more obvious? Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists