linux-kernel - Re: staging-slicoss: Replace variable initialisations by assignments in slic_if

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160103201530.GA32494@kroah.com>
Date:	Sun, 3 Jan 2016 12:15:30 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc:	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lior Dotan <liodot@...il.com>,
	Christopher Harrer <charrer@...critech.com>
Subject: Re: staging-slicoss: Replace variable initialisations by assignments
 in slic_if_init()

On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 09:10:45PM +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> Can such fine-tuning result in positive effects for the run-time behaviour?
> > 
> > If you can not benchmark and show the proof, don't even start to claim
> > such a thing.
> 
> Which measurement results would you accept for further discussion?

If you don't know how to show your results, then this whole discussion
is pointless.

*plonk*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/