[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <568A530F.8020807@uclinux.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 21:10:07 +1000
From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>
To: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Frederik Völkel <frederik.voelkel@....de>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...cs.fau.de, Lukas Braun <lukas.braun@....de>,
uClinux development list <uclinux-dev@...inux.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: Remove 68328 driver
On 04/01/16 20:30, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 15:03:50 +1000
> Greg Ungerer <gregungerer@...tnet.com.au> wrote:
>
>> If 68328serial.c is removed is there any point keeping the
>> architecture support for 68328 platforms?
>>
>> The 68328serial.c provides pretty much the only type of console
>> that can be used on these devices. They are largely useless
>> without this
>
> Probably we should - unless someone wants to stand up and say "actually
> I'm using this with current kernels, need it, and I'll maintain it"
>
> Somehow I doubt anyone is.
Yep, I suspect you are right.
I can't even remember the last time a patch or improvement
for 68328 came past me. Same goes for 68360 cpu/platform
as well.
Regards
Greg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists