linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] serial: Remove 68328 driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 4 Jan 2016 10:30:31 +0000
From:	One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Greg Ungerer <gregungerer@...tnet.com.au>
Cc:	Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Frederik Völkel <frederik.voelkel@....de>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...cs.fau.de, Lukas Braun <lukas.braun@....de>,
	uClinux development list <uclinux-dev@...inux.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: Remove 68328 driver

On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 15:03:50 +1000
Greg Ungerer <gregungerer@...tnet.com.au> wrote:

> If 68328serial.c is removed is there any point keeping the
> architecture support for 68328 platforms?
> 
> The 68328serial.c provides pretty much the only type of console
> that can be used on these devices. They are largely useless
> without this

Probably we should - unless someone wants to stand up and say "actually
I'm using this with current kernels, need it, and I'll maintain it"

Somehow I doubt anyone is.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/