lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue,  5 Jan 2016 00:11:34 +0900
From:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] printk: add cpu number to the recursion_msg message

`recursion_bug' occupies 4 bytes to just tell us there was a recent
recursion bug (basically 'bool'). Make it a bit more informative and
keep in `recursion_bug' smp_processor_id of the CPU (the most recent
one) that has caused a recursive printk bug. For instance, the error
message will change from
	BUG: recent printk recursion!
to
	BUG: recent printk recursion on CPU5!

Rename `recursion_bug' to `recursion_bug_cpu'.

Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
---
 kernel/printk/printk.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
index 1fc89ba..a578653 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
@@ -1662,7 +1662,7 @@ asmlinkage int vprintk_emit(int facility, int level,
 			    const char *dict, size_t dictlen,
 			    const char *fmt, va_list args)
 {
-	static int recursion_bug;
+	static int recursion_bug_cpu = -1;
 	static char textbuf[LOG_LINE_MAX];
 	char *text = textbuf;
 	size_t text_len = 0;
@@ -1699,7 +1699,7 @@ asmlinkage int vprintk_emit(int facility, int level,
 		 * it can be printed at the next appropriate moment:
 		 */
 		if (!oops_in_progress && !lockdep_recursing(current)) {
-			recursion_bug = 1;
+			recursion_bug_cpu = this_cpu;
 			local_irq_restore(flags);
 			return 0;
 		}
@@ -1710,15 +1710,18 @@ asmlinkage int vprintk_emit(int facility, int level,
 	raw_spin_lock(&logbuf_lock);
 	logbuf_cpu = this_cpu;
 
-	if (unlikely(recursion_bug)) {
-		static const char recursion_msg[] =
-			"BUG: recent printk recursion!";
+	if (unlikely(recursion_bug_cpu != -1)) {
+		static char recursion_msg[41];
+		size_t len;
+
+		len = sprintf(recursion_msg,
+				"BUG: recent printk recursion on CPU%d!",
+				recursion_bug_cpu);
 
-		recursion_bug = 0;
+		recursion_bug_cpu = -1;
 		/* emit KERN_CRIT message */
 		printed_len += log_store(0, 2, LOG_PREFIX|LOG_NEWLINE, 0,
-					 NULL, 0, recursion_msg,
-					 strlen(recursion_msg));
+					 NULL, 0, recursion_msg, len);
 	}
 
 	nmi_message_lost = get_nmi_message_lost();
-- 
2.7.0.rc0.20.g4b9ab0e

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ