linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] printk: add cpu number to the recursion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160104152832.GA3115@swordfish>
Date:	Tue, 5 Jan 2016 00:28:32 +0900
From:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: add cpu number to the recursion_msg message

On (01/05/16 00:11), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> `recursion_bug' occupies 4 bytes to just tell us there was a recent
> recursion bug (basically 'bool'). Make it a bit more informative and
> keep in `recursion_bug' smp_processor_id of the CPU (the most recent
> one) that has caused a recursive printk bug. For instance, the error
> message will change from
> 	BUG: recent printk recursion!
> to
> 	BUG: recent printk recursion on CPU5!
> 

on the other hand -- no, this is silly. disregard, sorry. It's just my
setup that confused me.

but I think we can change `recursion_bug' type to `bool'. what do you think?

===8<===8<===

>From d772453988289efc3bae5598c3c12c6e7ffb801a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 00:21:17 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] printk: change recursion_bug type to bool

`recursion_bug' is used as recursion_bug toggle, so make it `bool'.

Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
---
 kernel/printk/printk.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
index 1fc89ba..d0b8697 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
@@ -1662,7 +1662,7 @@ asmlinkage int vprintk_emit(int facility, int level,
 			    const char *dict, size_t dictlen,
 			    const char *fmt, va_list args)
 {
-	static int recursion_bug;
+	static bool recursion_bug;
 	static char textbuf[LOG_LINE_MAX];
 	char *text = textbuf;
 	size_t text_len = 0;
@@ -1699,7 +1699,7 @@ asmlinkage int vprintk_emit(int facility, int level,
 		 * it can be printed at the next appropriate moment:
 		 */
 		if (!oops_in_progress && !lockdep_recursing(current)) {
-			recursion_bug = 1;
+			recursion_bug = true;
 			local_irq_restore(flags);
 			return 0;
 		}
@@ -1714,7 +1714,7 @@ asmlinkage int vprintk_emit(int facility, int level,
 		static const char recursion_msg[] =
 			"BUG: recent printk recursion!";
 
-		recursion_bug = 0;
+		recursion_bug = false;
 		/* emit KERN_CRIT message */
 		printed_len += log_store(0, 2, LOG_PREFIX|LOG_NEWLINE, 0,
 					 NULL, 0, recursion_msg,
-- 
2.7.0.rc0.20.g4b9ab0e

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/