linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/17] usb: host: ehci-dbg: fix up function definitions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 5 Jan 2016 12:36:42 -0300
From:	"Geyslan G. Bem" <geyslan@...il.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/17] usb: host: ehci-dbg: fix up function definitions

2016-01-05 12:27 GMT-03:00 Geyslan G. Bem <geyslan@...il.com>:
> 2016-01-05 12:23 GMT-03:00 Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>:
>> On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 10:12 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
>>> On Mon, 4 Jan 2016, Geyslan G. Bem wrote:
>>>
>>> > >> @@ -404,12 +422,8 @@ static inline char token_mark(struct ehci_hcd *ehci, __hc32 token)
>>> > >>       return '/';
>>> > >>  }
>>> > >>
>>> > >> -static void qh_lines(
>>> > >> -     struct ehci_hcd *ehci,
>>> > >> -     struct ehci_qh *qh,
>>> > >> -     char **nextp,
>>> > >> -     unsigned *sizep
>>> > >> -)
>>> > >> +static void qh_lines(struct ehci_hcd *ehci, struct ehci_qh *qh,
>>> > >> +                     char **nextp, unsigned *sizep)
>>> > >>  {
>>> > >>       u32                     scratch;
>>> > >>       u32                     hw_curr;
>>> > >>
>>> > >
>>> > And about that style? Should be done?
>>>
>>> You mean squeezing the function parameters into two lines?  That's
>>> okay.
> Yes. I'll change this patch to do only that squeezing.
>
>>>
>>> However, the style in this file is to indent continuation lines by two
>>> extra tab stops, not to line things up with an open paren on the first
>>> line.
> I see. I used 3 tabs, reducing to 2.
>
>>
>> It's not consistent.
>> It's a bit of a mix of 1 and 2 tabs, and some others.
> I noticed it. Maybe to avoid the 80th column there are 1 tab indentations.

Others:

946
static struct debug_buffer *alloc_buffer(struct usb_bus *bus,
                ssize_t (*fill_func)(struct debug_buffer *))

has 4 tabs on the second line.

986
static ssize_t debug_output(struct file *file, char __user *user_buf,
                size_t len, loff_t *offset)

has 3 tabs and 4 spaces on the second line (aligned to open paren).

I think we should reduce them too to make the file consistent.

>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Geyslan G. Bem
> hackingbits.com



-- 
Regards,

Geyslan G. Bem
hackingbits.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/