linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 17/17] usb: host: ehci-dbg: refactor fill_periodic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGG-pUT1=Mj=R6+9cZ4RzLaPr_vc2_ot9OJ3RMzXpB=+kfZ31Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 5 Jan 2016 12:41:04 -0300
From:	"Geyslan G. Bem" <geyslan@...il.com>
To:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/17] usb: host: ehci-dbg: refactor fill_periodic_buffer function

2016-01-05 12:15 GMT-03:00 Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>:
> On Mon, 4 Jan 2016, Geyslan G. Bem wrote:
>
>> 2016-01-04 18:01 GMT-03:00 Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>:
>> > On Mon, 4 Jan 2016, Geyslan G. Bem wrote:
>> >
>> >> This patch fixes a coding style issue reported by checkpatch related to
>> >> many leading tabs, removing a 'do while' loop and making use of goto tag instead.
>> >
>> > This is highly questionable.  It's a big amount of code churn, nearly
>> > impossible to verify visually, just to remove one level of indentation.
>> > It also introduces an unnecessary backwards "goto", which seems like a
>> > bad idea.
>> After hear you I agree. I saw that others drivers uses similar
>> structure (fotg210-hcd.c and ohci-dbg.c), but they have less code. It
>> would be the case in this file of moving code to a new function? If
>> not, please disregard this patch.
>
> Moving code into a new sub-function would be okay.
Ok.

>
> BTW, you don't need to post these patches to both linux-usb and LKML.
> linux-usb alone is good enough.  Nothing about the patches would be
> especially interesting to a general Linux kernel programmer, so there's
> no point in bringing them to everybody's attention.
You're right. I used git send-email
--cc-cmd="scripts/get_maintainer.pl -i". Next patchset will not be
sent to LKML.
Tks.

>
> Alan Stern
>



-- 
Regards,

Geyslan G. Bem
hackingbits.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/