[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <568BEAD6.2060406@lwfinger.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 10:09:58 -0600
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
To: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@...hat.com>,
Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>
Cc: Sven Dziadek <sven.dziadek@....de>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] staging: rtl8723au: fix byte order problems
On 01/05/2016 09:53 AM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com> writes:
>> Hi Sven,
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 2:29 AM, Sven Dziadek <sven.dziadek@....de> wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/hal/rtl8723a_cmd.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/hal/rtl8723a_cmd.c
>>> index 1662c03c..57f5941 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/hal/rtl8723a_cmd.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/hal/rtl8723a_cmd.c
>>> @@ -93,11 +93,9 @@ int FillH2CCmd(struct rtw_adapter *padapter, u8 ElementID, u32 CmdLen,
>>>
>>> if (h2c_cmd & BIT(7)) {
>>> msgbox_ex_addr = REG_HMEBOX_EXT_0 + (h2c_box_num * EX_MESSAGE_BOX_SIZE);
>>> - h2c_cmd_ex = le16_to_cpu(h2c_cmd_ex);
>>> rtl8723au_write16(padapter, msgbox_ex_addr, h2c_cmd_ex);
>>> }
>>> msgbox_addr = REG_HMEBOX_0 + (h2c_box_num * MESSAGE_BOX_SIZE);
>>> - h2c_cmd = le32_to_cpu(h2c_cmd);
>>> rtl8723au_write32(padapter, msgbox_addr, h2c_cmd);
>>
>> While Jes has NACK'd this change, it does highlight that the h2c_cmd
>> and h2c_cmd_ex variables are being used to hold both cpu-endian and
>> little-endian data. A worthwhile change here might be to move the
>> conversion into the function call following these lines so that they
>> remain "clean".
>>
>> That said, I'm not sure this particular snippet of code would work on
>> big-endian at all as I'm pretty sure that BIT() produces cpu-endian
>> values and we know from the line you remove that h2c_cmd is
>> little-endian at this point.
>
> I am not opposed to cleaning it up, however I hope we can just remove
> all of the code down the line instead. You may want to look at the h2c
> implementation I did for rtl8xxxu. I believe it does work on big-endian,
> at least I know Larry has been able to test it on big-endian systems.
I have tested rtl8xxxu for the RTL8192CU devices on a PowerBook G4 with a
big-endian processor.
I do not have any RTL8723AU devices that can be tested this way, thus I have no
idea if either of the drivers work on BE. If I were to guess, I would expect the
staging driver to fail and rtl8xxxu to work.
Larry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists