linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 31/32] sh: support a 2-byte smp_store

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160106165740.GX6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Wed, 6 Jan 2016 17:57:40 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
Cc:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Dionne <jeff@...inux.org>,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 31/32] sh: support a 2-byte smp_store_mb

On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 09:42:35AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> (I would have thought the presence of working QEMU support would tide us
> over providing an easy basic regression testing environment, but people
> keep insisting that's not real and doesn't count. But if we can keep it
> 99% working until the sh4 patents expire later this year, we can add mmu
> and have full sh4 in hardware again with BSD VHDL.)

I didn't know there was a 'working' qemu for SH.

My personal 'complaint' with SH is its lack of maintainer feedback. I do
full arch sweeps on semi-regular basis, and while I know in very board
terms how a fair number of archs work its impossible to know everything
about all 25+ we support.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/