[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1452243464.30729.430.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 10:57:44 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Julian Margetson <runaway@...dw.ms>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ata: sata_dwc_460ex: use "dmas" DT property to find
dma channel
On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 18:32 +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> writes:
>
> > On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 19:36 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > >
> > So, Måns, Julian, I just have published my repository containing
> > Måns'
> > and my patches regarding dw_dmac and sata_dwc_460ex drivers here
> >
> > https://bitbucket.org/andy-shev/linux/branch/topic%2Fdw%2Fnext
>
> I've picked out the relevant changes from your branch and made some
> additional improvements. A few notes:
>
> - The __be32/__le32 typedefs for the DMA descriptor fields are
> necessary
> to avoid a million sparse warnings (and sparse is correct to warn).
Hmm… Which version of sparse are you using? I always run builds with
sparse enabled and didn't see anything.
> - Using #ifdef CONFIG_AVR32 is a step back, IMO, since this driver
> may
> well be used on another big endian system some day. The Kconfig
> logic
> for selecting this option could perhaps be improved though.
Maybe runtime chosen accessors will be better than ifdefs?
I don't like the Kconfig option which limits application of the
(compiled) driver.
>
> Tested on AVR32 (DMA driver) and Sigma SMP8642 (SATA driver).
>
> Code here:
> https://bitbucket.org/mansr/linux-dwc/branch/dwc-sata
Thanks for testing!
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists