[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <568FB757.9080303@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 18:49:19 +0530
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
<rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>
CC: <k.kozlowski.k@...il.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<pawel.moll@....com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, <galak@...eaurora.org>,
<linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <gnurou@...il.com>,
<lee.jones@...aro.org>, <broonie@...nel.org>,
<a.zummo@...ertech.it>, <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
<lgirdwood@...il.com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
<swarren@...dia.com>, <treding@...dia.com>,
Chaitanya Bandi <bandik@...dia.com>,
Mallikarjun Kasoju <mkasoju@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH 2/6] mfd: max77620: add core driver for MAX77620/MAX20024
On Friday 08 January 2016 06:44 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
> To avoid compilation warning, I need to use inline here.
> Because this shouldn't be defined in header at the first place. Instead
> define it in main MFD driver with EXPORT_SYMBOL() and put in headers
> just declaration.
>
what about __maybe_unused instead on inline and keep in header.
Anyhow, I do not have any personal choice here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists