[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4h+R4Aa7Zu3qWfmWwk6SWt22wuOowJvtpFhVUCdamTWDA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 16:03:18 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@....com>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory)" <elliott@....com>,
jmoyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
Dmitry Krivenok <krivenok.dmitry@...il.com>,
Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@....com>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
Rafael J Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] nvdimm: Add an IOCTL pass thru for DSM calls
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@....com> wrote:
[..]
>> Jerry Hoemann (6):
>> ACPI / util: Fix acpi_evaluate_dsm() argument type
>> nvdimm: Clean-up access mode check.
>> nvdimm: Add wrapper for IOCTL pass thru
>> nvdimm: Fix security issue with DSM IOCTL.
>> nvdimm: Increase max envelope size for IOCTL
>> nvdimm: Add IOCTL pass thru functions
>
> These look good to me.
>
> I'll tag "nvdimm: Fix security issue with DSM IOCTL." for -stable.
>
> Thanks Jerry!
I went to go write a test / support in ndctl for these and noticed a
few things I want to address before merging.
1/ Advertise 'call_dsm' as a supported command alongside the others.
2/ Disallow potentially invalid calls to reach firmware. At a minimum
the kernel needs to know the uuid in advance for any dsm it wants to
send. I.e. check the 'dsm_fun_idx' against the dsm_mask. This is
also important for making sure the kernel can manage exclusive access
to the configuration data area if present
(ND_CMD_{GET|SET}_CONFIG_DATA).
3/ This is minor, but it follows from 1/ that there may be some nvdimm
bus implementations that do not implement 'call_dsm' support.
'nfit_test' is currently one of those buses and we need to check for
that explicitly in nd_ioctl.
I have some patches in progress to address these.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists