[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160112013259.GC79247@tevye.fc.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 18:32:59 -0700
From: Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@....com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory)" <elliott@....com>,
jmoyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
Dmitry Krivenok <krivenok.dmitry@...il.com>,
Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@....com>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
Rafael J Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] nvdimm: Add an IOCTL pass thru for DSM calls
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 04:03:18PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@....com> wrote:
> [..]
> >> Jerry Hoemann (6):
> >> ACPI / util: Fix acpi_evaluate_dsm() argument type
> >> nvdimm: Clean-up access mode check.
> >> nvdimm: Add wrapper for IOCTL pass thru
> >> nvdimm: Fix security issue with DSM IOCTL.
> >> nvdimm: Increase max envelope size for IOCTL
> >> nvdimm: Add IOCTL pass thru functions
> >
> > These look good to me.
> >
> > I'll tag "nvdimm: Fix security issue with DSM IOCTL." for -stable.
> >
> > Thanks Jerry!
>
> I went to go write a test / support in ndctl for these and noticed a
> few things I want to address before merging.
>
> 1/ Advertise 'call_dsm' as a supported command alongside the others.
In sysfs? okay that makes sense.
>
> 2/ Disallow potentially invalid calls to reach firmware. At a minimum
> the kernel needs to know the uuid in advance for any dsm it wants to
> send. I.e. check the 'dsm_fun_idx' against the dsm_mask. This is
> also important for making sure the kernel can manage exclusive access
> to the configuration data area if present
> (ND_CMD_{GET|SET}_CONFIG_DATA).
Technically, the kernel doesn't need to know the uuid in advance
as that is part of the bundle passed into the passthru.
Are you concerned about firmware mis-behaving when presented
with a (UUID, Function_Index) that is not supported?
(and really we should add Revision ID to that tuple.)
In a prior version of the patch not sent upstream, I did "discover" the
uuid and set up the dsm_mask. However, this created a need to modify
kernel each time uuid changes. Also, i don't think this is necessary
as FW should be gracefully validating its input arguments. By
not setting up/using dsm_mask in pass thru case, this can be tested.
I don't understand the exclusive access concern w/ config data.
Could you please elaborate?
>
> 3/ This is minor, but it follows from 1/ that there may be some nvdimm
> bus implementations that do not implement 'call_dsm' support.
> 'nfit_test' is currently one of those buses and we need to check for
> that explicitly in nd_ioctl.
>
> I have some patches in progress to address these.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jerry Hoemann Software Engineer Hewlett Packard Enterprise
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Powered by blists - more mailing lists