[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <n70j5g$sem$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 15:53:20 +0000 (UTC)
From: Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: out-of-tree tty driver breakage (changing ASYNC_ bits)
On 2016-01-11, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 01:42:44PM -0800, Peter Hurley wrote:
>
>> This will break out-of-tree drivers but I don't really see a
>> realistic alternative. Also, I think the new symbol prefix ASY_ isn't
>> great and I'd like to get some suggestions.
>
> Don't worry about breaking out-of-tree drivers, that's fine.
One request from this maintainer of several out-of-tree drivers: if
you break something, break it such that it won't compile. It would be
nice to avoid changes that break functionality but still compile
without warning.
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! Where do your SOCKS
at go when you lose them in
gmail.com th' WASHER?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists