[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5693DD22.9020805@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 13:49:38 -0300
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nikhil Devshatwar <nikhil.nd@...com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
"Prabhakar\"" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] [media] Check v4l2_of_parse_endpoint() ret val in all
drivers
Hello Sakari,
On 01/09/2016 08:03 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Javier,
>
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 03:27:14PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> When discussing a patch [0] with Laurent Pinchart for another series I
>> mentioned to him that most callers of v4l2_of_parse_endpoint() weren't
>> checking the return value. This is likely due the function kernel-doc
>> stating incorrectly that the return value is always 0 but can return a
>> negative error code on failure.
>>
>> This trivial patch series fixes the function kernel-doc and add proper
>> error checking in all the drivers that are currently not doing so.
>
> After fixing patches 5 and 6,
>
Done, posted a v2 fixing the issues you pointed out.
> Acked-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
>
Thanks a lot for your feedback and review!
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America
Powered by blists - more mailing lists