[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160112222201.GA4125@hector.attlocal.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:22:01 -0600
From: Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] arm64: dts: apq8016-sbc: add regulators support
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 02:30:34PM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>
>
> On 12/01/16 13:59, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >On Tuesday 12 January 2016 13:46:32 Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> >> };
> >>
> >>+ smd {
> >>+ rpm {
> >>+ rpm-requests {
> >>+ pm8916-regulators {
> >>+
> >>+ vdd_l1_l2_l3-supply = <&pm8916_s3>;
> >>+ vdd_l5-supply = <&pm8916_s3>;
> >>+ vdd_l4_l5_l6-supply = <&pm8916_s4>;
> >>+ vdd_l7-supply = <&pm8916_s4>;
> >>+
> >>
> >
> >If you're nested this deeply, you should consider using labels, e.g.
> >
> Labels are good and works for me.
>
> Stephen/Andy are you ok to use labels for such deeply nested nodes in board
> dts?
I tend to agree with Arnd. I am ok with using labels.
<snip>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists