lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160112222201.GA4125@hector.attlocal.net>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:22:01 -0600
From:	Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>
To:	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] arm64: dts: apq8016-sbc: add regulators support

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 02:30:34PM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> 
> 
> On 12/01/16 13:59, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >On Tuesday 12 January 2016 13:46:32 Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> >>         };
> >>
> >>+       smd {
> >>+               rpm {
> >>+                       rpm-requests {
> >>+                               pm8916-regulators {
> >>+
> >>+                                       vdd_l1_l2_l3-supply = <&pm8916_s3>;
> >>+                                       vdd_l5-supply = <&pm8916_s3>;
> >>+                                       vdd_l4_l5_l6-supply = <&pm8916_s4>;
> >>+                                       vdd_l7-supply = <&pm8916_s4>;
> >>+
> >>
> >
> >If you're nested this deeply, you should consider using labels, e.g.
> >
> Labels are good and works for me.
> 
> Stephen/Andy are you ok to use labels for such deeply nested nodes in board
> dts?

I tend to agree with Arnd.  I am ok with using labels.

<snip>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ