linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] spi: atmel: improve internal vs gpio chip-select choice

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 12 Jan 2016 08:51:00 +0000
From:	Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>
To:	Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>
Cc:	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"Yang\, Wenyou" <Wenyou.Yang@...el.com>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi: atmel: improve internal vs gpio chip-select choice

Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com> writes:

> Hi Mans,
>
> I've tried to apply your patch on a next-20160112 branch to test it but it
> failed. I've also looked at the for-next branch of the SPI sub-system git
> tree.
>
> It seems that one issue occurred within a chunk patching the atmel_spi_setup()
> function. Please see below.
>
> Le 11/01/2016 17:01, Mans Rullgard a écrit :
> [...]
>> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c b/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c
>> index 08cbb3e43c76..d4a806e24060 100644
>> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c
>> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c
> [...]
>> @@ -1603,6 +1611,7 @@ static int atmel_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
>>  		}
>>  
>>  		asd->npcs_pin = npcs_pin;
>> +		asd->use_cs_gpio = use_cs_gpio;
>>  		spi->controller_state = asd;
>>  	} else {
>>  		atmel_spi_lock(as);
> [...]
>
> There is no 'else' statement in the source code I'm looking at.

Sorry, I'll send a new patch against the correct base.  I forgot I had
something else earlier in my local branch.

-- 
Måns Rullgård