linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] mfd: smsc-ece1099: Fine-tuning for smsc_i2c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5694C0AF.2070809@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jan 2016 10:00:31 +0100
From:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mfd: smsc-ece1099: Fine-tuning for smsc_i2c_probe()

> This set is confusing.
> 
> Why do you have a cover letter specifying this as a 2 patch set,
> yet there are 4 patches attached to it?

I do not see too many messages for this update suggestion.


>> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
>> Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 15:10:48 +0100
> 
> What format is this?

Are such specifications needed to preserve the desired authorship information
during the transfer of commit messages by email?

Regards,
Markus