[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5695D906.2030405@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 12:56:38 +0800
From: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: <cl@...ux.com>, <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
<mika.j.penttila@...il.com>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <rjw@...ysocki.net>, <hpa@...or.com>,
<yasu.isimatu@...il.com>, <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
<kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>, <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>,
<gongzhaogang@...pur.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86, acpi, cpu-hotplug: Set persistent cpuid <->
nodeid mapping when booting.
On 01/09/2016 03:13 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Tang.
>
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 12:20:25PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
>> From: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
>>
>> This patch finishes step 4.
> This doesn't help people trying to read the patch. If you wanna say
> it's one of the steps of something, you also need to say what the
> steps are. No need to duplicate the whole thing but a short summary
> would be helpful.
Sure. Thx.
>
>> This patch set the persistent cpuid <-> nodeid mapping for all enabled/disabled
>> processors at boot time via an additional acpi namespace walk for processors.
> So, the patchset generally looks good to me although I'm not too
> familiar with acpi. Rafael, Len, what do you think?
>
> Thanks.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists