linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] ARM64 LPC: update binding doc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4304958.38AKuZJ4gb@wuerfel>
Date:	Wed, 13 Jan 2016 11:18:11 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	liviu.dudau@....com
Cc:	Rongrong Zou <zourongrong@...wei.com>,
	Rongrong Zou <zourongrong@...il.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxarm@...wei.com,
	benh@...nel.crashing.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] ARM64 LPC: update binding doc

On Wednesday 13 January 2016 10:10:28 liviu.dudau@....com wrote:
> 
> OK, but from DT point of view and given the parent's #address-cells = <2> and #size-cells = <1>
> should the reg not be something like reg = <0x1 0x0 0xe4 4> ?

No: 2+1 = 3, not 4.

	Arnd