[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160113104612.GA10249@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 11:46:12 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/vdso/pvclock: Protect STABLE check with the seqcount
* Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> Hi Ingo-
>
> Can you apply this before the tip:x86/asm pull request goes out? It
> fixes a regression in tip:x86/asm.
Ooops, saw this mail too late - I'll merge this up into x86/urgent right now and
send all pending fixes to Linus.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists