[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160113104847.GA11575@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 11:48:47 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Rethinking sigcontext's xfeatures slightly for PKRU's benefit?
* Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 02:38:20PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:59:14AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > Stupid question, but what the heck is PKRU? A grep of the kernel tree
> > > > shows no results, and a web search returns mostly Thai language results.
> > >
> > > That should explain it:
> > >
> > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151214190542.39C4886D@viggo.jf.intel.com
> >
> > There's also an LWN article from last year, as background:
> >
> > https://lwn.net/Articles/643797/
>
> I had actually seen both the thread and the article before, but the
> "PKRU" subject didn't really lead to either..
Yeah, stupid vendor acronyms.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists