[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10839.1452692211@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 13:36:51 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Tadeusz Struk <tstruk@...il.com>,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, tadeusz.struk@...el.com,
smueller@...onox.de, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
marcel@...tmann.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
peterhuewe@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] crypto: AF_ALG - add support for keys/asymmetric-type
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> wrote:
> David, is there a way to do that test purely in software without
> needing hardware support? We know that the data might not actually be
> present in all cases... is there an easy test for that case?
I have written a user TPM driver that talks to a userspace TPM implementation
out of the backend. It's been pushed to the TPM driver guy but I'm not sure
what became of it. I'll chase it up.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists