linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] tty/serial: atmel: Include module.h to fix build failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 13 Jan 2016 07:06:47 -0800
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	postmaster <postmaster@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] tty/serial: atmel: Include module.h to fix build
 failure

On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 16:02 +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 09:44:10PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 21:35 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
[]
> > > Sudip, one option would be to set up a semi-private mailing list.
> > > My build tests now have a dedicated virtual host (kerneltests.org).
> > > I could set up a managed list there.
> > 
> > Perhaps it'd be better to have something like linux-build-failures@...r.kernel.org
> 
> yes, much better. But if me and Guenter are the only two members of that
> list then it will not look nice. :)

Likely kbuild-robot output would use it.
That would be better than bcc'ing lkml.