[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5hio2xmh9z.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:05:44 +0100
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Jie Yang <yang.jie@...el.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: sound: use-after-free in snd_timer_interrupt
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 19:34:36 +0100,
Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> wrote:
> > This and your other relevant reports seem pointing the race of timer
> > ioctls. Although snd_timer_close() itself calls snd_timer_stop(),
> > there is no other protection against the concurrent execution.
> >
> > If my guess is correct, a simplistic fix like below should work. It
> > basically serializes the timer ioctl by using a new mutex (and
> > replacing the old tread_sem mutex). They are no longtime blocking
> > calls, so this shouldn't be a big problem. But certainly there can be
> > a less intrusive way to paper over this if this really matters.
> >
> > In this case for timer.c, I'd leave the final decision rather to
> > Jaroslav. Jaroslav, what do you think?
>
>
> After applying this patch I still see the following WARNINGS:
>
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 30398 at lib/list_debug.c:53 __list_del_entry+0x10b/0x1e0()
> list_del corruption, ffff880032d933b0->next is LIST_POISON1 (dead000000000100)
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 2 PID: 30398 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted 4.4.0+ #241
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
> 00000000ffffffff ffff8800627778d8 ffffffff82926eed ffff880062777948
> ffff880061c2af80 ffffffff8660b640 ffff880062777918 ffffffff81350c89
> ffffffff8298e77b ffffed000c4eef25 ffffffff8660b640 0000000000000035
> Call Trace:
> [< inline >] __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:15
> [<ffffffff82926eed>] dump_stack+0x6f/0xa2 lib/dump_stack.c:50
> [<ffffffff81350c89>] warn_slowpath_common+0xd9/0x140 kernel/panic.c:483
> [<ffffffff81350d99>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0xa9/0xd0 kernel/panic.c:495
> [<ffffffff8298e77b>] __list_del_entry+0x10b/0x1e0 lib/list_debug.c:51
> [< inline >] list_del_init include/linux/list.h:145
> [<ffffffff84ebd199>] _snd_timer_stop+0x119/0x450 sound/core/timer.c:501
This is
list_del_init(&timeri->active_list);
right? Possibly the following oneliner covers it?
thanks,
Takashi
---
diff --git a/sound/core/timer.c b/sound/core/timer.c
index b03a9e489286..3810ee8f1205 100644
--- a/sound/core/timer.c
+++ b/sound/core/timer.c
@@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ void snd_timer_interrupt(struct snd_timer * timer, unsigned long ticks_left)
} else {
ti->flags &= ~SNDRV_TIMER_IFLG_RUNNING;
if (--timer->running)
- list_del(&ti->active_list);
+ list_del_init(&ti->active_list);
}
if ((timer->hw.flags & SNDRV_TIMER_HW_TASKLET) ||
(ti->flags & SNDRV_TIMER_IFLG_FAST))
Powered by blists - more mailing lists