[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+a1KpzS5RW4U2JY6sgpVxBGmGttYKptMe34bY4AD2ED-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:10:39 +0100
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Drysdale <drysdale@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@...cle.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Tavis Ormandy <taviso@...gle.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kernel: add kcov code coverage
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov
<kirill@...temov.name> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've tried to build current -next with the patch. It has few reject, but
> nothing major.
>
> Booting the kernel in qemu with CONFIG_KCOV=y has failed. It hangs on
> "smpboot: Total of 3 processors activated (9178.27 BogoMIPS)"
>
> The interesting part is that I have only 2 cpu in this setup!
>
> Huh?
>
> CONFIG_KCOV=n works fine.
Hi Kirill,
Thanks for testing.
I will try to reproduce this if you provide:
- location of the -next tree
- gcc revision
- .config
- qemu command line
Alternatively, you can try to bulk disable instrumentation of
everything related to boot process (by adding KCOV_INSTRUMENT := n to
the Makefile). Most likely it is due to instrumentation. If it helps,
try to bisect the the guilty files.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists